Did you get more leads, or did the same people contact you twice?
Your report shows more calls and forms. Yet intake keeps seeing the same names. Did the campaign bring more people to your firm, or did the same people try again? Before you spend more, you need to know what that lead count means.
Ask your intake lead and whoever handles marketing to trace a small group together. One person may have called twice and filled out a form about the same need. Another may share a phone with a family member who needs separate help. Treating both cases the same will give you the wrong count.
Count each contact and each new inquiry separately. Link contacts only when the team confirms they concern the same request. Keep the calls and forms in the history. Leave unclear matches open for review. The method below shows your team how to do that and gives you a report you can use to judge the next spending decision.
Start here
- Count contact events and new inquiries separately.
- Confirm the person and request before linking contacts. Keep unclear matches open.
- Keep each contact’s source, time and open work when you correct the count.
Agree on what one inquiry means
Start by asking what the report calls a lead. A phone call, a person and a request for help are different things. Use these four terms with intake and marketing so they count the same thing.
- A call and a form about the same request can be two events and one inquiry.
- One person can ask about a separate new matter. Follow the firm’s screening and reporting rules before treating it as the same inquiry.
- Two family members may share a phone but need separate help. Do not merge their identities or immigration matters because the number matches. The firm decides how to structure the legal work.
| What you count | What it means |
|---|---|
| Contact event | One incoming call, form or message. It shows activity, not always a new request. |
| Person or contact record | Who is getting in touch. One person can make several requests. A shared phone can belong to more than one person. |
| Inquiry or opportunity | A distinct request for help that the firm tracks through its intake process. |
| Matter | The legal work tracked under the firm’s matter rules. A call or inquiry is not, by itself, a new matter. |
Check the contacts that may belong together
Have the intake lead compare the record IDs, contact details, dates, channels and requests. A matching name or phone number is a reason to check, not proof of a match. Use the firm’s approved identity and screening steps. Do not reveal details from another record to ask whether the caller is that person.
Check both identity and the request. The same person may call from a new number about an old inquiry. They may also use the same number to ask for different help. Keep separate requests apart even when the person is the same.
Use the decisions below. These decide how the contact enters this report. They do not replace screening, a conflict check or an attorney’s decision.
| What the check shows | How to count and route it |
|---|---|
| Same person, same request | Link the event to that inquiry. Keep the event and its time. |
| A separate request, confirmed under the firm’s process | Keep a separate inquiry. Keep any related contact records linked without merging legal identities. |
| Follow-up on an inquiry opened before this period | Count this period’s contact event, but not a new inquiry for this period. |
| An existing client asks about current work | Route it to the legal team. Keep it out of the new-inquiry count. |
| A confirmed test or spam contact | Exclude it from new inquiries and keep the reason for the exclusion. |
| The person or request is still unclear | Mark it unresolved. Give someone the check and any response that is still due. |
Link the inquiry without losing the work
You do not need to delete or merge records to make the first report. Use a small map: event E01 belongs to inquiry Q01, E02 also belongs to Q01, and E03 is still under review. That lets the team check the count before changing the CRM.
For a confirmed match, keep the original source, each later channel and all contact times. Preserve the person’s contact limits, open questions and follow-up tasks. If two staff members are chasing the same request, settle who takes the open work before stopping the duplicate task.
Take a person who sends a form through paid search, then phones about it. Keep the paid-search form and the later call. Replacing the source with ‘phone’ hides how the inquiry began. If the original source is missing, record it as unknown rather than choosing the most recent channel.
A duplicate CRM row is not always another contact. If one form was imported twice, keep one form event in the report and record the extra row as a data error. Otherwise, a report can inflate both contacts and inquiries.
Do not mark an unanswered inquiry as spam just to clear the queue. A lack of reply tells you nothing by itself about whether the request was real or belonged to another record.
- Identify the contact event
- Check the person and request
- Confirm the match or leave it open
- Link the history and open work
- Count new inquiries for the period
Work through one count
Take a report with 12 inbound contact events in one week. These are calls, forms and messages, not extra copies made by an import. Intake checks which request each event belongs to.
- Seven events belong to four confirmed new inquiries. Three of those seven are repeats beyond each inquiry’s first contact.
- The other five are two contacts about an older inquiry, one existing-client contact, one test and one unresolved event.
- The full count is 7 + 2 + 1 + 1 + 1 = 12 contact events. Report four confirmed new inquiries and one unresolved event. Do not call four the final total while E12 remains open.
| Events | What the team confirms | Count |
|---|---|---|
| E01, E02, E03 | Same new request Q01 | 3 events; 1 new inquiry |
| E04, E05 | Same new request Q02 | 2 events; 1 new inquiry |
| E06 | New request Q03 | 1 event; 1 new inquiry |
| E07 | New request Q04 | 1 event; 1 new inquiry |
| E08, E09 | Follow-up on Q-old, opened before this week | 2 events; no new inquiry this week |
| E10 | Existing-client service question | 1 event; legal team handles it |
| E11 | Confirmed test contact | 1 event; excluded from new inquiries |
| E12 | Person or request still unclear | 1 event; unresolved |
Ask why the marketing report differs
Ask your marketing provider to name what each report counts. Is it form submissions, calls, tracked conversions, people or new inquiries? Which date puts an item in this week? Which channels are included? How are repeats, tests and older inquiries handled? Different answers can produce different totals without either report being broken.
Google Ads lets you choose ‘One’ or ‘Every’ for each conversion action. In Google’s example, one person submits forms for two different conversion actions. Even with ‘One,’ that produces two conversions: one for each action. The choice applies to a tracked action after an ad interaction; it is not a single count of every person or legal request across your firm.
The practical point: a Google Ads conversion total cannot, on its own, settle your new-inquiry count. Ask the provider to explain the setup and compare it with the intake map. Keep the original channel evidence. Do not change the source or erase repeats just to make the two reports match.
The same care applies to conversion rates. If two of the four confirmed new inquiries above later sign by your review date, that group has a signing rate of 2 ÷ 4 = 50%. Dividing those same two by all 12 contact events gives about 16.7%, but it answers a different question. No extra client appeared when the denominator changed.
Follow the same inquiry group when checking later results. E12 may change the final group once it is resolved. Keep the review date and open decisions visible, and keep signatures separate from payments.
Use the sheet and check the next report
Use this sheet for the contacts the team needs to review. Keep sensitive details in the firm’s system; the review sheet can point to record IDs. Set the period before counting new inquiries, and use the original opened date once the request is matched.
- For E02 above, the sheet could say: ‘Linked to Q01. Same request confirmed through the firm’s checks. New inquiry already counted at E01. Keep E02 as a later contact; no extra new inquiry.’ The team still keeps any question or task from E02.
- For E12, record what needs checking and who will do it. Do not force a match to finish the report. The person can still need a reply while the reporting question is open.
- At the next review, show contact events, confirmed new inquiries, repeats within those new inquiries, older-inquiry contacts, excluded contacts and unresolved events. Show why each exclusion was made.
| Check | What to record |
|---|---|
| Contact event | Event ID, date, channel and source record |
| Possible inquiry match | Inquiry ID and original opened date |
| Evidence | What supports the same request, a separate request or an unresolved match |
| Decision | Same / separate / older inquiry / existing client / test-spam / unresolved |
| New inquiry this period? | Yes / no / unresolved, with the reason |
| Source history | Original source and later contacts kept; missing source left unknown |
| Open work | Action, person responsible and due time |
| Review | Reviewer and date checked |
Fix the cause, not just the total
Ask intake and marketing to bring one repeated cause from the review. If an import copied forms into new rows, the person who manages that connection should fix the import. If people used a second channel because no one answered the first, intake needs to address the wait. Those are different problems.
Agree on one change and a date to check the next group. Use the same counting rules and periods. Look for the specific error you meant to fix, and check that real new requests still reach the right person.
A lower corrected lead count does not show worse marketing. A higher corrected signing rate does not show better sales. First get the count right. Then use it with the outcomes from those inquiries to judge the work.
For help putting the shared record and follow-up process in place, see Intake & CRM setup.
Questions about this guide
Can we combine records with the same phone number?
Not from the number alone. Family members may share a phone and need separate help. Follow the firm’s identity and screening steps before linking requests. Keep separate legal identities and matters separate.
Is a new call from an old contact always a repeat inquiry?
No. The person may need help with a separate request. Check what they need against the earlier inquiry. An update on an old request is a new contact event, but not a new inquiry for this period.
What should we report when a match is unclear?
Show confirmed new inquiries and unresolved events separately. Assign the check and any response still due. Do not treat an unclear match as a duplicate or invent a final total.